[SSSD] [PATCH] Bad check for id_provider=local and access_provider=permit
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu May 10 17:05:42 UTC 2012
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 11:56 -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> Thanks for explanation :).
> Something like that?
>
> tmp =
> ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string(res->msgs[0],CONFDB_DOMAIN_ACCESS_PROVIDER,NULL);
> if (tmp && strcasecmp(tmp, "permit") != 0) {
> .......
>
> And documentatión
>
> <term>access_provider (string)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> The access control provider used for the
> domain.
> There are two built-in access providers
> (in
> addition to any included in installed
> backends)
> Internal special providers are:
> </para>
> <para>
> <quote>permit</quote> always allow access.
> It's the only permitted access provider for a local domain.
Yes, this looks more like what we need here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20120510/ffdf30af/attachment.sig>
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list