[SSSD] Problem in sssd and libsss_autofs

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Mar 26 12:02:28 UTC 2012


On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:35 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I would like to report this packaging(?) problem.
> As you can see in the following output, there's not a dependency
> between the rpm libsss_autofs and sssd.
> 

You're right. Looks like we're (incorrectly) including libsss_autofs.so
in both the 'sssd' and 'libsss_autofs' packages. As a result, we're not
causing an implicit update of libsss_autofs and they're conflicting.

I'll get out an update right away. Thanks for reporting this!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20120326/b679128b/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list