[SSSD] [PATCH] Only do one cycle when resolving a server

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Mar 6 20:30:30 UTC 2012


On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:22 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:26 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1214
> > 
> > I was actually going back and forth on the implementation -- my first
> > approach was to separate requests for "beginning to resolve a service" and
> > "give me another server for this service".
> > 
> > I think that is more natural way to perform the resolution, but it turned out
> > that this approach would require bigger changes to the back ends and I'm not
> > sure if I can justify that just for the sake of nicer code at this point of
> > 1.8 development. I still have a WIP patch that builds, should we decide that
> > it's actually better to separate requests for first and any next server..
> 
> As discussed on IRC, we're going to go ahead with this patch for now,
> but we're going to evaluate the benefits of the alternate approach later
> when we start looking at differentiating between primary and backup
> servers.
> 
> Ack for master and sssd-1-8.

Pushed to master and sssd-1-8.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20120306/43947142/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list