[SSSD] [Design] Common SIGCHLD handling for providers
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Fri Oct 14 19:27:12 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 13:10 +0200, Pavel Zůna wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SigChld
That's not exactly what I was looking for (among other things, it
doesn't account for removal of children that are no longer alive). I
added an alternate proposal to that page. Please read it and see if it
makes sense to you.
Also, using the online/offline callbacks as an example wasn't a good
place to work from. Those are designed the way they are because they can
be triggered from multiple places, not just the SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2
debugging signals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20111014/cd99045e/attachment.sig>
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list