[SSSD] SIGSEGV in sssd_be using ldap_init_fd

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Fri Jul 29 13:40:45 UTC 2011


On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 14:35 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> 
> > On 07/29/2011 03:25 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
> >>>> I'm thinking sssd likely to crawl into a hole at some point anyway, but the
> >>>> caching's a whole lot more sane, so I'm hoping it'll plod along more
> >>>> successfully than nss_ldap/nscd.
> >> Just for kicks and giggles I pointed it at the entire tree (rather than the
> >> normal subset I use), and ran 'id myusername'.
> >>
> >> First call:
> >>
> >> real    3m45.453s
> >>
> >> 182M    cache_default.ldb
> >
> > This should be much faster once 1.6.0 is out (next week, hopefully),
> > because we'll be using the ASQ dereferencing control[1] rather than
> > sequentially requesting all group members.
> >
> > [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa746418%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
> 
> So if I tested again git head, that would be representative of what I might
> expect from 1.6?
> 
> I'm more than happy to provide a data point for just how good you are against
> a big installation!


Yeah, you can use git head, or drop
http://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/ipa-devel-rhel.repo
into /etc/yum.repos.d and "yum update sssd" (that's our development
repository with all of the latest committed bits). Easier than building
it yourself :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20110729/880f0dbf/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list