[SSSD] [PATCH] Add common SIGCHLD handling.

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Dec 14 18:03:49 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 09:15 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
> On Dec 14, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Are you going to fix the two comments you had originally in the later
> > patch? Those were don't consider it fatal if the PID isn't found
> > in the hash in sss_child_handler() and reordering sss_child_invoke_cb()
> > 
> > If so, then ack
> 
> 
> The first part of that I already described above as being an incorrect
> reading of the source. I missed the second part and I'll fix that
> shortly.


New patch attached fixes the missing reordering of the
sssd_child_invoke_cb() and adds more explicit handling of unknown PIDs
(with a new DEBUG log message).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Add-common-SIGCHLD-handling-for-providers.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 13992 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20111214/3e44d20b/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20111214/3e44d20b/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list