[SSSD] [PATCH] Use sysdb attribute name for GID, not LDAP attribute

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Aug 11 17:14:36 UTC 2011


This was working in the common case, because for most (non-AD) directory
servers, the LDAP attribute and the sysdb attribute had the same name.

However, this was incorrect behavior.

In the future, I've asked our QE group to set up LDAP servers with ALL
non-standard attribute names, so that we'll discover mistakes of this
nature sooner.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Use-sysdb-attribute-name-for-GID-not-LDAP-attribute.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2045 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20110811/3cfe4d24/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20110811/3cfe4d24/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list