[SSSD] [PATCH] Reviewed sssd-ldap man page
Jan Zelený
jzeleny at redhat.com
Wed Sep 1 13:04:36 UTC 2010
I'm sending updated patch:
> I would personally prefer not to delete the above sentence altogether,
> just rephrase it. Sorry for nitpicking, but I know that the schema
> differences have been a cause of confusion among users, so I think we
> should keep the documentation as descriptive as possible.
You're probably right. Done.
> This would better be answered by a native English speaker, but "parental
> object" does not sound right to me, is just "parent object" better?
I think it is correct this way. As you said, native English speaker should
probably decide this.
> Also, In description of most of the added ldap_user_* attributes, I
> think that "this parameter" would sound better than just "this".
Done
> This option is already described in sssd.conf since it is used by the
> proxy backend, too.
Removed
> I'm wondering whether this should be considered a generic option,
> similar to entry_cache_timeout and documented in sssd.conf. I think any
> future back ends might implement a cleanup task, too, controlled by the
> same parameter, even though LDAP is the only implemented ID provider so
> far.
Removed
--
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Reviewed-sssd-ldap-man-page.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 12153 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20100901/585db57d/attachment.bin>
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list