[SSSD] Behaviour of getgrnam/getgrgid
Ralf Haferkamp
rhafer at suse.de
Mon Oct 11 08:15:13 UTC 2010
On Friday 01 October 2010 15:22:09 Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> find yet another release of the patches attached. It adresses the
> remaining issues we discussed in IRC:
>
> - included the Simo's style fixes and rearrangements to better match
> the overall sssd code style
> - Errors detected in sdap_process_group_members() are not considered
> fatal (apart from ENOMEM conditions, where it doesn't seem to make a
> lot of sense to continue).
> We just log an error message an skip to the next member. This could
> be improved a bit by stopping to send new LDAP request when
> sdap_get_generic_recv() error code e.g. indicates that the LDAP
> connection is permanently broken. What error code would that be,
> EIO? But this should probably better addressed together with #633.
Any news on this? Is the patch now acceptable?
regards,
Ralf
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list