[SSSD] [PATCH] Unbreak the build when check-devel is not installed or of sufficient version

George McCollister georgem at novatech-llc.com
Wed Mar 10 22:26:11 UTC 2010


Stephen,

It turns out I do have check for my target. To get things working I had
to add $(CHECK_LIBS) to stress_tests_LDADD. Applying this patch caused
even more problems because HAVE_CHECK is not defined in config.h even
when configure finds check. I should be on IRC tomorrow if you want to
talk about it.

George

On 03/10/2010 09:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I discovered when trying to build RPMs on EPEL5 (which does not have a
> compatible version of check) that the build failed trying to link the
> common.c test utilities.
>
> - -- 
> Stephen Gallagher
> RHCE 804006346421761
>
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuXwF4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NCUgCdGbpsKZEDI0emBFgOhS3yqg+Z
> Vz4AoKnyHL9/BhzvlfByotjJDBcYn/YO
> =oWLF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20100310/e76c2fda/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list