[SSSD] [PATCH] Adding Requires: libsemanage

Jeff Schroeder jeffschroeder at computer.org
Wed Jun 2 14:55:30 UTC 2010


On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/02/2010 10:37 AM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I am using: rpm-4.6.1-3.fc10. It properly added a dep on
>> libsemanage.so.6, but I thought a new dependency should be explicit vs
>> implicit sort of like the zen of python. Perhaps I was wrong in
>> thinking this but it is a bit annoying to not see a dep like that when
>> staring at the spec file. No worries either way as this patch is very
>> trivial.
>>
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires

Ah. Well in that case, I rescind the original patch unless you think
it will be necessary for RHEL or some older version of rpm.

-- 
Jeff Schroeder

Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
http://www.digitalprognosis.com



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list