[SSSD] [PATCH] Convert the example config to v2 format, upgrade config on update only
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Fri Sep 25 17:01:03 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2009 12:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/25/2009 11:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On 09/25/2009 05:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> Nack
>
>>> The changes to sssd.spec.in are unnecessary. The upgrade_config.py
>>> already does an internal check and bails out if the version is already
>>> matched.
>
>
>> I know there is a check in the script but I still think it is better to
>> not run the script at all if we know we are installing and not
>> upgrading. At least we don't output the "config file already v2" message
>> while having the message in the script for manual runs.
>
>> Anyway, I reverted the change in the specfile
>
> Actually, I wish you hadn't reverted it. I forgot that it printed that
> message. I will merge that specfile change back in before committing.
>
>
>>> There's trailing whitespace after min_id in [domains/AD] (and it still
>>> is [domains/AD] instead of [domain/AD]
>
>> Thanks, fixed.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>
>
Merged the specfile change back in and pushed.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkq8908ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NZbgCdEQ0UVU1Rie+MQOhVqozLCBiO
rb4AnRsGIvQt1N5E+BjRgeCoflYWdAm9
=Etia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list