[SSSD] [PATCH] COLLECTION Copy collection flat with concatenated names

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Sep 9 13:15:45 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/08/2009 09:25 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> 
>>
>>> I am unclear about couple things here:
>>> a) Is my solution acceptable for the given situation?
>>> b) If not what is the preferred solution?
>>> c) What is different about the given typecast and why this typecast
>>> suppresses
>>> warning (if it does) while others do not?
>>
>>> Please advise.
>>
>> I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I think you did it the
>> right way, Dmitri. (provided of course that you free that memory
>> responsibly when you no longer need it)
> 
> This is exactly where I get confused.
> I free memory I allocated and I do not free memory I did not.
> The pointer in question can point to the external memory
> passed in that I do not control on this level or to the allocated
> memory that I free at some point. This is why I kind of
> confused...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Pushed to master.


- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqnqoEACgkQeiVVYja6o6Oe5wCeLxXX9PXnh7usk8GbuVMN93Ug
pcoAniq6ByC0DWbmpKx4lCbJwqA4OumU
=GGxQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list