[SSSD] [PATCH] Fix for #236

Sumit Bose sbose at redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 10:23:26 UTC 2009


On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:01:39PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 13:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Except some rare cases out use of tevent_req_is_error() was dangerous.
> > Almost everywhere where we used it it was probably ok, but given the
> > semantics of that function I think using the macro in this patch is much
> > safer.
> 
> Bad patch,
> attached a new one that actually compiles ...
> 
> Simo.
> 

Patch does not apply, please rebase. It looks ok by visual inspection
but I would like to run some 'real' tests.

Will you try to fix this issue upstream ?

bye,
Sumit



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list