[SSSD] [PATCH] Eliminate unnecessary explicit timeout for DP account requests

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Aug 12 13:04:20 UTC 2009


On 08/12/2009 08:51 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> D-BUS handles timeouts itself and reports DBUS_ERROR_NO_REPLY if
> a timeout fires, so we can rely on this instead of having an
> explicit timeout ourselves. Furthermore, the two timeouts present
> a potential race condition.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Patch was nacked on IRC. I forgot to take advantage of the 'timeout'
argument passed in.

New patch attached.

-- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Eliminate-unnecessary-explicit-timeout-for-DP-accoun.patch
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20090812/64e18a02/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20090812/64e18a02/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list