BIND and HTTP STIGs

Shawn Wells shawn at redhat.com
Fri Mar 20 13:07:19 UTC 2015


Depends on how agnostic the content is.

E.g the webmin is also meant to work on Gentoo/Ubuntu in addition to RHEL, so made sense for its own tree.

--
Shawn Wells
Director, Innovation Programs
shawn at redhat.com | 443.534.0130
@shawndwells

> On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry user keyboard error. 
> 
> I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and was wanting to add them back into the scap-security-guide content when I am done. My question is should there be a separate content tree like what we have for RHEL/6, RHEL/7, etc. but for BIND and HTTP, or should the XCCDF be added to RHEL/6/input/services/dns.xml and RHEL/6/input/services/http.xml?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabe
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>         I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and
> 
> -- 
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/attachments/20150320/c8c74f52/attachment.html>


More information about the scap-security-guide mailing list