[PATCH] Removing ntpdate as a package doesn't make sense, because it's a dependency of ntp, a package we want to be installed. It's suffient to check that the ntpdate service is not configured to start.
David Smith
dsmith at secure-innovations.net
Tue Mar 25 20:17:24 UTC 2014
Great catch, please push!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Maura Dailey <maura at eclipse.ncsc.mil>wrote:
> This removes the package_ntpdate_removed.xml check and the reference to it
> in the service disable check.
>
> - Maura Dailey
>
> Signed-off-by: Maura Dailey <maura at eclipse.ncsc.mil>
> ---
> RHEL/6/input/checks/package_ntpdate_removed.xml | 25
> ----------------------
> RHEL/6/input/checks/service_ntpdate_disabled.xml | 5 +---
> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 RHEL/6/input/checks/package_ntpdate_removed.xml
>
> diff --git a/RHEL/6/input/checks/package_ntpdate_removed.xml
> b/RHEL/6/input/checks/package_ntpdate_removed.xml
> deleted file mode 100644
> index a78fb82..0000000
> --- a/RHEL/6/input/checks/package_ntpdate_removed.xml
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
> -<def-group>
> - <!-- THIS FILE IS GENERATED by create_package_removed.py. DO NOT EDIT.
> -->
> - <definition class="compliance" id="package_ntpdate_removed"
> - version="1">
> - <metadata>
> - <title>Package ntpdate Removed</title>
> - <affected family="unix">
> - <platform>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6</platform>
> - </affected>
> - <description>The RPM package ntpdate should be
> removed.</description>
> - </metadata>
> - <criteria>
> - <criterion comment="package ntpdate is removed"
> - test_ref="test_package_ntpdate_removed" />
> - </criteria>
> - </definition>
> - <linux:rpminfo_test check="all" check_existence="none_exist"
> - id="test_package_ntpdate_removed" version="1"
> - comment="package ntpdate is removed">
> - <linux:object object_ref="obj_package_ntpdate" />
> - </linux:rpminfo_test>
> - <linux:rpminfo_object id="obj_package_ntpdate" version="1">
> - <linux:name>ntpdate</linux:name>
> - </linux:rpminfo_object>
> -</def-group>
> diff --git a/RHEL/6/input/checks/service_ntpdate_disabled.xml
> b/RHEL/6/input/checks/service_ntpdate_disabled.xml
> index 5a9559e..1aee2d9 100644
> --- a/RHEL/6/input/checks/service_ntpdate_disabled.xml
> +++ b/RHEL/6/input/checks/service_ntpdate_disabled.xml
> @@ -10,9 +10,7 @@
> <description>The ntpdate service should be disabled if
> possible.</description>
> <reference source="DS" ref_id="20130918" ref_url="test_attestation"
> />
> </metadata>
> - <criteria comment="package ntpdate removed or service ntpdate is not
> configured to start" operator="OR">
> - <extend_definition comment="ntpdate removed"
> definition_ref="package_ntpdate_removed" />
> - <criteria operator="AND" comment="service ntpdate is not configured
> to start">
> + <criteria comment="service ntpdate is not configured to start"
> operator="AND">
> <criterion comment="ntpdate runlevel 0"
> test_ref="test_runlevel0_ntpdate" />
> <criterion comment="ntpdate runlevel 1"
> test_ref="test_runlevel1_ntpdate" />
> <criterion comment="ntpdate runlevel 2"
> test_ref="test_runlevel2_ntpdate" />
> @@ -21,7 +19,6 @@
> <criterion comment="ntpdate runlevel 5"
> test_ref="test_runlevel5_ntpdate" />
> <criterion comment="ntpdate runlevel 6"
> test_ref="test_runlevel6_ntpdate" />
> </criteria>
> - </criteria>
> </definition>
> <unix:runlevel_test check="all" check_existence="any_exist"
> comment="Runlevel test" id="test_runlevel0_ntpdate"
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/attachments/20140325/16ed909c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list