pam_passwdqc vs pam_cracklib
Joe Nall
joe at nall.com
Fri Sep 28 13:44:06 UTC 2012
On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:27 AM, "Spencer R. Shimko" <sshimko at tresys.com> wrote:
> Is anyone strongly bound to pam_cracklib? The reason I ask is that the prose and OVAL checks are currently written for pam_cracklib. pam_cracklib doesn't enforce complexity requirements on UID 0. pam_passwdqc can enforce password complexity requirements on root with the "enforce=everyone" option. Many requirement sets do not differentiate between privilege users and unprivileged users in the I&A sections. As a result I'd like to switch to passwdqc. Unless there is opposition we'll put together a patch to make the switch.
We've used pam_passwdqc on a RHEL 6.2 based cross domain system with no certification issues.
joe
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list