[PATCH 0/2] Various OCIL modifications

Jeffrey Blank blank at eclipse.ncsc.mil
Wed Sep 26 17:23:51 UTC 2012


The first is mostly fine (ACK), but for the second one I think Michael
should weigh in.

You're adding clause= attributes to existing checks where that has been
specifically identified as Michael's task:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-September/001659.html

If he hasn't gotten to the ones you've added, then maybe he can grant
you an ACK.




On 09/26/2012 10:43 AM, David Smith wrote:
> added OCIL checks and clauses
> 
> David Smith (2):
>   added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
>   added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
> 
>  RHEL6/input/system/accounts/pam.xml                |   24 +++++++++++++
>  RHEL6/input/system/accounts/physical.xml           |   28 +++++++++++++++
>  .../accounts/restrictions/password_expiration.xml  |   36 +++++++++++++++----
>  RHEL6/input/system/accounts/session.xml            |   31 ++++++++++++-----
>  RHEL6/input/system/permissions/files.xml           |   20 +++++-----
>  5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide


More information about the scap-security-guide mailing list