[PATCH 0/2] Various OCIL modifications
Jeffrey Blank
blank at eclipse.ncsc.mil
Wed Sep 26 17:23:51 UTC 2012
The first is mostly fine (ACK), but for the second one I think Michael
should weigh in.
You're adding clause= attributes to existing checks where that has been
specifically identified as Michael's task:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-September/001659.html
If he hasn't gotten to the ones you've added, then maybe he can grant
you an ACK.
On 09/26/2012 10:43 AM, David Smith wrote:
> added OCIL checks and clauses
>
> David Smith (2):
> added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
> added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
>
> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/pam.xml | 24 +++++++++++++
> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/physical.xml | 28 +++++++++++++++
> .../accounts/restrictions/password_expiration.xml | 36 +++++++++++++++----
> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/session.xml | 31 ++++++++++++-----
> RHEL6/input/system/permissions/files.xml | 20 +++++-----
> 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list