[PATCH] Fix paths and requires in spec file.

Jeffrey Blank blank at eclipse.ncsc.mil
Tue Sep 4 17:35:53 UTC 2012


Sounds good.  And there is other benefit already in Spencer's patch
(with regard to RPM Requires), so I'll give Spencer an ACK unless
someone indicates that they would prefer to wait...




On 08/29/2012 09:44 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:59:30 PM Spencer R. Shimko wrote:
>>>>   * Wed Jul 3 2012 Jeffrey Blank <blank at eclipse.ncsc.mil> 1.0-3
>>>>   - Modified install section, made description more concise.
>>>
>>> In preparing SSG for packaging into EPEL (and eventually RHEL), one of
>>> the fedora guys reviewed our RPM build and dropped suggestions on making
>>> everything FHS compliant. They recommended things be put into
>>> /usr/share/lib, but I agree that /usr/share/doc is sane given the nature
>>> of the content. Reference
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/scap-security-guide/ticket/107
>>
>> I considered /usr/lib and /usr/libexec but those are for object files and
>> helper apps.  Since this RPM only contains XML and HTML files it doesn't
>> seem like a good fit.  I'm open to being convinced otherwise though.
> 
> We are talking this over. Give us a little time to come to a decision. We 
> might do something like  /usr/share/xml/scap/<policy>  so that apps can have a 
> standard location to expect policy.  I'll come back with an official 
> recommendation.
> 
> -Steve
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide


More information about the scap-security-guide mailing list