NTP server(s)
Joe Wulf
joe_wulf at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 25 17:02:35 UTC 2012
I second that motion.
R,
-Joe
>________________________________
> From: Gary Gapinski <Gapinski at nasa.gov>
>To: scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
>Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:38 PM
>Subject: NTP server(s)
>
>Dunno if this is worth a change or not, but the gentleman from Raytheon mentioned that the older STIG recommended several NTP servers.
>
>Having been burned personally by a shady NTP server, as well as a shady local oscillator, best practice might be 3+ (to ensure quorum).
>
>The current content (V-150) only requires that NTP be enabled (a very good thing) and that there is at least one server. (better than none).
>
>_______________________________________________
>scap-security-guide mailing list
>scap-security-guide at lists.fedorahosted.org
>https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/attachments/20121025/76557e8e/attachment.html>
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list