To atime or relatime?
Shawn Wells
shawn at redhat.com
Thu Jun 14 03:53:49 UTC 2012
I received this note from a colleague today regarding content in the
scap-security-guide for RHEL6:
> Ext4 mounts devices with the relatime option by default. Probably not a good idea for secure environments. Means atime is not accurate. Very bad for systems using AIDE. RHEL 6 security guide needs to turn atime back on for Ext4 mounts.
>
> cat /proc/mounts
>
> Sent from iPhone.
When he states that "atime is not accurate" I believe he's referring to
how relatime maintains atime data, but not for each time the file was
accessed. Only /modified/.
From a performance perspective relatime makes a lot of sense.
Enablement of relatime means that the filesystem will not write
read-times to a file when read. Imagine recording every time a file in
hadoop or a highly utilized fileshare was read... that could be a lot of
overhead which relatime prevents.
With that said, we're writing a security guide and not a performance
guide. What does everyone think about this, and what should we do? One
option is to set "default_relatime=0" in grub to prevent any filesystem
from doing this. Is that overkill?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/attachments/20120613/810b9d77/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list