[PATCH 06/11] Added Group unmet_impractical_product, as discussed with Jeff Blank, it was accidentally removed on an earlier commit.
Shawn Wells
shawn at redhat.com
Mon Jul 2 21:20:14 UTC 2012
On 7/2/12 5:18 PM, Willy Santos wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Willy Santos <wsantos at redhat.com>
> ---
> rhel6/src/input/auxiliary/srg_support.xml | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rhel6/src/input/auxiliary/srg_support.xml b/rhel6/src/input/auxiliary/srg_support.xml
> index da0a785..6bc5030 100644
> --- a/rhel6/src/input/auxiliary/srg_support.xml
> +++ b/rhel6/src/input/auxiliary/srg_support.xml
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ The requirement is impractical or out of scope.
> <ref disa="165,21,354,1094,371,372,535,537,539,780,1682,1383,370,66,37,213,221,25" />
> </Group> <!-- end unmet_impractical_guidance -->
>
> +<Group id="unmet_impractical_product">
> +<title>Product Does Not Meet this Requirement Due to Impracticality or Scope</title>
> +<description>
> +The product does not meet this requirement.
> +The requirement is impractical or out of scope.
> +</description>
> +<ref disa="" />
> +</Group> <!-- end unmet_impractical_product -->
> +
> <Group id="requirement_unclear">
> <title>Implementation of the Requirement is Unclear</title>
> <description>
Gah, how did I miss this before.
Ack
More information about the scap-security-guide
mailing list