RHq-Metrics Use cases ( was Re: No concept of a platform? )

Juraci Paixão Kröhling jpkroehling at redhat.com
Fri Jan 16 08:30:32 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/15/2015 10:28 PM, mike thompson wrote:
> Security via KeyCloak may eliminate some of these possibilities.
> Perhaps Juca can elaborate on this aspect.

I'll be looking into Keycloak's support and/or alternatives for a Web
Sockets environment today. What I can say for now is that, even if
Keycloak doesn't provides seamless support on those environments, it
should still be possible to at least authenticate a request/message as
the client can add the bearer token as a header to the message and the
server can contact the Keycloak's server using this token.
Authorization would need to be done at the application level, though
(ie: is this user allowed to perform this request?).

- - Juca.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUuMwnAAoJECKM1e+fkPrXmKkH/iftdIADcU81Z+qroOl74UsU
CNLru4Vt7yoJ6ac5Oiq+EymYMRd7wYHRyenq4ZUaBpN2tOn7Ib9tcdm41li5aonx
BpghFlJ/8op20u9CaWnBSMZNlQWDvt5wkXlq8E8bfNFxHNp5i9CpbdONDRtRbdyw
CnGPMwYjPPWm372iuguNN4frBtwnMtsQRzKvNefa/RZeqJuPKnHWHiKA18baMoFE
3DFOLeRUWFO1g4ok5kQFibD/8uBH9eNSvF3m0Z07dRLRKapBGoNxVRaKrrwkWpJk
PY8bBwyQSFxDflQz9sH82M4p+T8BqUONDBbnLqzCfT2gNDjdpELhdImsoo0awLc=
=ww79
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list