Cassandra + ElasticSearch

Alan Santos asantos at redhat.com
Fri Mar 14 18:18:59 UTC 2014


I would also be interested in seeing this, but co-locating the two implies similar scale out strategy and/or workload - it’s not clear that’s the case. 

but yes, from a provisioning pov it does simplify things. 

-alan

 
On Mar 14, 2014, at 2:09 PM, James Strachan <james.strachan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Elias
> 
> co-locating ElasticSearch on the same boxes as Cassandra sounds awesome! Any chance you could post the Cassandra piece? I'd love to try it; as it'd make provisioning RHQ much simpler with just Cassandra and ES talking to it; then if feels like there's just a single database to manage.
> 
> -- 
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
> 
> Email: jstracha at redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source Integration
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20140314/06568c23/attachment.html>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list