Optimization of descendent resource queries
Jay Shaughnessy
jshaughn at redhat.com
Mon Mar 3 17:05:02 UTC 2014
Thomas, as far as I can see, yes. There were basically 4 queries I
found. And all of those have been replaced. If there is something else
lurking I didn't see it in my searches of domain and server jar code.
If you know of something let me know, or if you want to to search around
to double-check my looking, please do! I don't think this means we want
to necessarily go crazy with deep trees, especially low levels with
high cardinality like that query-cache thing. But if it is required to
go to level 7 I think it will now be OK.
And welcome back :)
-Jay
On 3/3/2014 11:00 AM, Thomas Segismont wrote:
> Le 21/02/2014 21:09, Jay Shaughnessy a écrit :
>> The other nice thing here is that it gives us a way to eliminate our
>> artificial limit on hierarchy depth. Today, due to these queries we can
>> suport up to 6 levels under a platform. Anything deeper and we're in
>> trouble, these queries won't see them.
>
> Jay,
>
> Does the fix for Bug 1025918 remove the artificial inventory depth
> limit completely? I had understood that these type of recursive
> queries could be found in quite a few places.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list