adoc, md or both?
Heiko W.Rupp
hrupp at redhat.com
Fri Dec 5 10:34:17 UTC 2014
https://twitter.com/mojavelinux/status/539667494168829952
So basically .adoc will be a 1st class citizen in GH soon.
=> let's use adoc all over.
> Am 05.12.2014 um 11:28 schrieb Thomas Segismont <tsegismo at redhat.com>:
>
> Le 05/12/2014 11:07, Peter Palaga a écrit :
>> On 2014-12-05 10:24, Thomas Segismont wrote:
>>> Le 04/12/2014 21:54, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Am 04.12.2014 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Palaga <ppalaga at redhat.com>:
>>>>> we have both adoc, and md READMEs in metrics ATM. Is anybody against
>>>>> preferring adoc and converting all present md files to adoc?
>>>>
>>>> No and we should use AsciiDoc(tor) only.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to agree ... :)
>>>
>>> But the Github support of Asciidoc is not extensive. I wrote a quite
>>> long README.adoc file for the netty-collectd project,
>>
>> Yeah, as I just checked on GitHub, they still use AsciiDoctor 0.1.4,
>> which is quite outdated. I'd be OK with tolerating MD till GitHub
>
> Thanks, you're so kind :)
>
>> upgrades their AsciiDoctor, but anyway: do you see a feature commonly
>> used in READMEs, that is broken on GitHub now? READMEs tend to be quite
>> simple, do they not?
>
> I like anchors and links to them, that was one of the things totally broken with Github's asciidoc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
--
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Technopark II, Haus C,
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht München HRB 153243
Geschäftsführer: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Paul Hickey, Charlie Peters
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list