[rhq.next] Java 8
John Sanda
jsanda at redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 14:41:05 UTC 2014
Any additional thoughts on whether or not we can use Java 8? Heiko, I was hoping you could shed some light here.
> On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Jiri Kremser <jkremser at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> +100
>
> btw. I found an interesting project[1] on GitHub backporting lambas to old java versions. However, it needs to run with -javaagent option. All in all just a syntactic sugar I guess. Guava might be still better for older Java versions.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/orfjackal/retrolambda
> jk
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "John Sanda" <jsanda at redhat.com>
> | To: rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> | Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 3:57:13 PM
> | Subject: [rhq.next] Java 8
> |
> | There was some discussion yesterday on IRC about Java 8. Since we are
> | starting new with the rhq.next projects, I think it is worth
> | asking/considering. Can/should we use Java 8? Is there anything that would
> | prevent us from doing so?
> | _______________________________________________
> | rhq-devel mailing list
> | rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> | https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
> |
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list