Enterpriser Server Jar Naming - Fix

Jay Shaughnessy jshaughn at redhat.com
Thu Jul 18 15:15:21 UTC 2013


On 7/18/2013 11:09 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> Am 18.07.2013 um 16:48 schrieb John Mazzitelli:
>> As to why we need "startup":
> So only rhq-startup ?

I think rhq-server-startup module.
>
>> that is simply duplicating virtually the same name as the EJB3 jar (which is now rhq-server.jar). And if you want confusion, do that and then tell people "go look at the server jar".
> Well I guess people are already confused because the rhq.ear is inside that.
>
> We could also move the ear to $RHQSERVER/rhq-deploy/ and tell the deplyoment scanner while installing to
> also scan that directory.
> This should also help a lot with the length of paths.
> Also all those rhq-downloads could also be put next to the rhq.ear
>
> I mean now is a good point in time for such changes
>

To reduce churn, I'm fine with the current approach, just a change to 
the module name.   I'm on Windows and am not suffering from the long 
path issue in my dev container (c:\work\rhq\dev-container\...) or my 
production installs (c:\app\rhq\rhq-server-<version>\...).

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20130718/26b65383/attachment.html>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list