Quick Poll on a naming issue...
Jiri Kremser
jkremser at redhat.com
Fri Apr 19 09:14:24 UTC 2013
+1 on rhqctl
If user adds it to its PATH env., it will be easy to call it from anywhere as a common unix command.
jk
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Segismont" <tsegismo at redhat.com>
> To: rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:42:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Quick Poll on a naming issue...
>
> +1
>
> Le 18/04/2013 23:26, Larry O'Leary a écrit :
> > I like rhqctl myself.
> >
> > Of course, I still do not understand why the .sh extension is used. .sh
> > indicates that the script is an include or should be passed to a shell
> > using:
> >
> > . rhqctl.sh
> > source rhqctl.sh
> >
> > Or:
> >
> > sh rhqctl.sh
> > bash rhqctl.sh
> >
> >
> > Where as: "rhqctl" (no extension with execute attribute set) on *nix
> > allows one to use the same command on Windows and *nix platforms:
> >
> > Linux:
> > ./rhqctl start
> > Windows
> > rhqctl start
> >
> > And documentation no longer has to say rhqctl.[sh|cmd].
> >
> > Any way, just one of my pet peeves. :)
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list