Quick Poll on a naming issue...

Jiri Kremser jkremser at redhat.com
Fri Apr 19 09:14:24 UTC 2013


+1 on rhqctl

If user adds it to its PATH env., it will be easy to call it from anywhere as a common unix command.

jk

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Segismont" <tsegismo at redhat.com>
> To: rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:42:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Quick Poll on a naming issue...
> 
> +1
> 
> Le 18/04/2013 23:26, Larry O'Leary a écrit :
> > I like rhqctl myself.
> >
> > Of course, I still do not understand why the .sh extension is used. .sh
> > indicates that the script is an include or should be passed to a shell
> > using:
> >
> >     . rhqctl.sh
> >     source rhqctl.sh
> >
> > Or:
> >
> >     sh rhqctl.sh
> >     bash rhqctl.sh
> >
> >
> > Where as: "rhqctl" (no extension with execute attribute set) on *nix
> > allows one to use the same command on Windows and *nix platforms:
> >
> > Linux:
> >     ./rhqctl start
> > Windows
> >     rhqctl start
> >
> > And documentation no longer has to say rhqctl.[sh|cmd].
> >
> > Any way, just one of my pet peeves. :)
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
> 


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list