Quick Poll on a naming issue...
Jay Shaughnessy
jshaughn at redhat.com
Thu Apr 18 19:35:01 UTC 2013
We weren't sure what was best so we're asking for feedback for naming
the new control stuff. There are currently files (and one property) named:
rhqctl.sh
rhqctl.properties
rhqctl.log
-Drhqctl.properties-file
The abbreviation is obviously shorter, and maybe more attractive to the linux population.
An alternative would be:
rhqctl.sh --> rhq-control.sh
rhqctl.properties --> rhq-control.properties
rhqctl.log --> rhq-control.log
-Drhqctl.properties-file --> -Drhq.control.properties-file
This is more aligned to much of our current naming.
Please let us know, thanks.
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list