chart types discussion
Andreas Dietrich
adi at aspicon.de
Wed Nov 10 10:04:44 UTC 2010
That's an interesting point. You should have a look at how this is
done e.g. in SPC (statistical proccess control) tools that are standard
e.g. in the manufacturing industry and have a very similar use case:
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_process_control)
The six sigma control charts are common in the chip or solar industry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_sigma
E.g. such control charts would be appropriate ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_chart#Chart_details ... to
- see control limits (warning and critical limits)
- see critical values (also their state ... acknowledged or not ... e.g.
bold red or thin red marks)
- comment on critical values or ranges (acknowledgement)
But again ... I would see this as a low prio feature since we (RHQ
users) are all aware of the alerts that matter and are setup.
The charts would not really improve our use cases.
On 11/10/2010 10:52 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> This brings me to an idea:
>
> Am 10.11.2010 um 10:46 schrieb Andreas Dietrich:
>> and resource limitations or are recognized by alerts that "watch" those
>> time-based developments for me in the background (and they are purists
> If there are alerts defined (not applicable for all types), we could draw
> small dotted lines in the graphs that show the alerting conditions.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list