Script and Script2 names

John Mazzitelli mazz at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 15:41:19 UTC 2009


On 12/15/2009 10:39 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Any chance of making those friendlier names as they move from
> experimental to "standard"?
>

I wouldn't consider script to be experimental - its pretty fully 
functional for what we need it to do (and extensible for people that 
need additional things). So, I would say "script" is the official name 
of that one :)

I don't know what to call "script2" plugin - perhaps "interpreter" ???





More information about the rhq-devel mailing list