Script and Script2 names
John Mazzitelli
mazz at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 15:41:19 UTC 2009
On 12/15/2009 10:39 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Any chance of making those friendlier names as they move from
> experimental to "standard"?
>
I wouldn't consider script to be experimental - its pretty fully
functional for what we need it to do (and extensible for people that
need additional things). So, I would say "script" is the official name
of that one :)
I don't know what to call "script2" plugin - perhaps "interpreter" ???
More information about the rhq-devel
mailing list