the future of software provider

Michal Minář miminar at redhat.com
Mon Jan 13 11:55:50 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello dear OpenLMI followers.

I'd like to know your opinion on migrating LMI Software Provider to
PackageKit. In particular what priority does it have?

All the pros and cons are listed in upstream ticket:
  https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/ticket/199

Certainly this migration is desired. What I'd like to know is whether
this shall take precedence over other feature requests targeted for
OpenLMI 1.1.0. If not, yum implementation would get some enhancements,
but rewrite would be delayed thanks to them, and it would take more time
to complete it.

Main features to be implented in software provider:
  * listing updates
  * listing package dependencies
  * support for mass update

I'm in favor of making the rewrite the highest priority. What do
you think?

Best regards,
Michal Minar

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS09RGAAoJEPezUylxRFUDHxUIAIOTK77dioYhD3K/5r040dGu
AmXPIDapFe07mvYlLFpKL8L7Pq9Z0a1qXC2aoHa9/fTYcCzU6YMYl2TUC915NoG5
651uavqdPl8U9zjwPaMstz+lF5UwNgcTq8dK4V70YEoe5qYf1dzMO/B+gi1zyHu3
0m9B74qUAoT8oKObUXAMvmkF2d335Y6mn0Ry7iRzrUZtVCr5ccyyafYiFIA/l5Qa
MfKhTfuh+YgIYIASl7FfzSjrzelpYClk2vvxUSLx4DBWp2yblEAlLQig5EOQdqBu
QmYW0jJSQrv4Vo1xRB5t4QX0IFeL3JEoAq4DsBwxLR9x8rwDreAI5ibJsLVGaQM=
=+HZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list