question about openlmi

Ales Ledvinka aledvink at redhat.com
Wed Feb 19 09:35:46 UTC 2014


http://cvs.opengroup.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pegasus/readme.jmpi?rev=1.20&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
http://cvs.opengroup.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pegasus/src/Pegasus/ProviderManager2/JMPI/


----- Original Message -----
From: "MaShimiao" <mashimiao.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
To: openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:29:13 AM
Subject: Re: question about openlmi

Hello Ales,

On 02/18/2014 10:50 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> For providers written in Java you might want to check status / availability of
> 
> http://osdir.com/ml/network.open-pegasus.general/2004-03/msg00078.html
> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/pegasus/pp/protected/revdocuments/799/JMPI1.1-PEP.html
Thank you very much.

Best regards,
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MaShimiao" <mashimiao.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
> To: openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:32:29 PM
> Subject: Re: question about openlmi
> 
> On 02/13/2014 01:57 AM, Russell Doty wrote:
>> It looks like WWJL (Writing While Jet Lagged) can be dangerous. My last
>> email contained some inaccurate information on what components are
>> supported as part of the upstream OpenLMI.org project.
>>
>> I need to be more clear on some components:
>>
>> The OpenLMI Upstream Project (based at www.openlmi.org) is focused on
>> LMI Providers built on a standard infrastructure. www.openlmi.org is the
>> place to go for developing Providers. This mailing list is for the
>> upstream OpenLMI project (but may discuss other things).
>>
>> Other upstream projects provide complementary components. For example,
>> OpenPegasus comes from the OpenPegasus project from The Open Group.
>> Language bindings come from a variety of places, such as the SBLIM
>> project.
>>
>> Depending on what you are trying to do, you may need components from
>> several projects, and potentially go to these projects for support.
>>
>> If a company like Red Hat should choose to ship OpenLMI technology, they
>> may choose to provide support the complementary technologies; this is
>> outside the OpenLMI upstream project.
>>
>> I will be more careful how I use the term "supported" in the future when
>> talking about the upstream OpenLMI project.
> Got it.
> Thank you very much, Russell.
> Thanks all of you.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openlmi-devel mailing list
>> openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openlmi-devel mailing list
> openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
> _______________________________________________
> openlmi-devel mailing list
> openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
openlmi-devel mailing list
openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list