openlmi-scripts license

Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat.com
Mon Jul 29 19:21:26 UTC 2013


Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> writes:

> Ok, while your point is valid, there's an (unfortunate) perception by
> many that what I said is true. [...]

Please help correct the perception then! :-)

> I stand by my recommendation that we should use a more permissive
> license here.  I'm certainly open to arguments to the contrary,
> though.

Considering the tiny (?) scripts, any elaborate licensing is probably
unjustified.  Public domain, dual licensing, BSD, whatever...

 
- FChE


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list