openlmi-scripts license
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche at redhat.com
Mon Jul 29 19:21:26 UTC 2013
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> writes:
> Ok, while your point is valid, there's an (unfortunate) perception by
> many that what I said is true. [...]
Please help correct the perception then! :-)
> I stand by my recommendation that we should use a more permissive
> license here. I'm certainly open to arguments to the contrary,
> though.
Considering the tiny (?) scripts, any elaborate licensing is probably
unjustified. Public domain, dual licensing, BSD, whatever...
- FChE
More information about the openlmi-devel
mailing list