SFCB/Pegasus patches to prioritize Pegasus installation

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Aug 21 13:08:54 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/21/2013 08:56 AM, Roman Rakus wrote:
> This seems to be correct. What I can imagine is also a group of
> packages. What other thinks about it? Having all stuff (CIMOM,
> providers, lmishell, ...) in one group will inform people what
> other thing are available.
> 



I was thinking about having us provide a set of meta-packages like
'openlmi-server' and 'openlmi-enterprise' that would bind up the set
of providers, CIMOMs and dependencies that we want people to be
installing most of the time.

openlmi-server (normal set of providers for all servers):
tog-pegasus
openlmi-storage
openlmi-networking
openlmi-software
openlmi-account
openlmi-realmd
openlmi-service

openlmi-enterprise (comprehensive providers and discovery):
openlmi-server
openslp
openlmi-fan
openlmi-hardware
openlmi-logicalfile
openlmi-powermanagement


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIUu+YACgkQeiVVYja6o6OZvQCgmFHInKhZGQ17JOfRFKIftQ3R
pSoAn18eDZRBanpCvyC9r0ioIjjxAwNR
=EsA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list