SFCB/Pegasus patches to prioritize Pegasus installation
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Aug 21 13:08:54 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/21/2013 08:56 AM, Roman Rakus wrote:
> This seems to be correct. What I can imagine is also a group of
> packages. What other thinks about it? Having all stuff (CIMOM,
> providers, lmishell, ...) in one group will inform people what
> other thing are available.
>
I was thinking about having us provide a set of meta-packages like
'openlmi-server' and 'openlmi-enterprise' that would bind up the set
of providers, CIMOMs and dependencies that we want people to be
installing most of the time.
openlmi-server (normal set of providers for all servers):
tog-pegasus
openlmi-storage
openlmi-networking
openlmi-software
openlmi-account
openlmi-realmd
openlmi-service
openlmi-enterprise (comprehensive providers and discovery):
openlmi-server
openslp
openlmi-fan
openlmi-hardware
openlmi-logicalfile
openlmi-powermanagement
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIUu+YACgkQeiVVYja6o6OZvQCgmFHInKhZGQ17JOfRFKIftQ3R
pSoAn18eDZRBanpCvyC9r0ioIjjxAwNR
=EsA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the openlmi-devel
mailing list