[PATCH 1/5] Rewrite DWARF string functions using known-dwarf macros.
Mark Wielaard
mjw at redhat.com
Thu Aug 16 11:46:55 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 12:57 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The readelf output is "foobar (123)" for these things.
> So, frankly the old "??? (456)" seems pretty well fine to me.
> Are there output formats where you're not showing the raw value
> when you show the decoded value?
Yes, there are a couple (tags, forms and locexpr opcodes), but that can
be fixed to show them if the decoded value comes out as ???.
More information about the elfutils-devel
mailing list