bswap_32() macro with postincrement

Roland McGrath roland at redhat.com
Thu Mar 10 17:56:23 UTC 2011


I believe that glibc has recently fixed the m68k implementation not to
produce that warning.  (AIUI it was only a combination of mediocre macros
and imperfect compilers that made it emit that warning, and there was no
actual danger of incorrect code.)

I made the change on the portable branch, which is the only place we put
workarounds for crappy environments.


Thanks,
Roland


More information about the elfutils-devel mailing list