dwarflint: DW_AT_location being empty vs. missing check
Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratochvil at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 21:36:23 UTC 2009
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:17:57 +0100, Roland McGrath wrote:
> It would be great to collect these ideas on the DwarfLint wiki page
done.
> I had actually contemplated the converse check. That is, call questionable
> a variable/formal_parameter DIE with no location attrs (nor alternatives
> like const_value). I thought of this because the buggy/poor GCC generation
> for e.g. inlines' parameters' locations produced no attrs at all and looks
> like the compiler just forgot they could have them.
>From the practical standpoint I agree (as it is now missing in PR debug/39372).
Thanks,
Jan
More information about the elfutils-devel
mailing list