[LIBREPORT PATCH 1/2] rhbz: test rhbz_new_bug() return value for errors

Denys Vlasenko dvlasenk at redhat.com
Tue Jul 2 09:21:31 UTC 2013


On 07/02/2013 11:08 AM, Jakub Filak wrote:
> Yes, I agree. See the next patch.
> 
> Anyway, new_id could be -1 and we should check it. So, this patch is
> probably unnecessary but makes the code more robust (and I though you
> like robust code).

Pushed both patches. Thanks!


More information about the Crash-catcher mailing list