[ABRT PATCH] abrt-cli list: don't print @N thing. rhbz#906733

Denys Vlasenko dvlasenk at redhat.com
Fri Aug 30 10:49:20 UTC 2013


Once upon a time it was meant to allow addressing problems with @N
instead of full name. However, it is problematic - what the numbering
should be if e.g. --since DATE was used? Should we scan all directories
regardless because we want to show the same @N's as in full list?
Same problem with "--full List even reported problems" versus
!--full.

I think git had a right idea: "shortcut" ID should be based on
substring match, not a numbering.

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk at redhat.com>
---
 src/cli/list.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/cli/list.c b/src/cli/list.c
index 840d621..4ca334f 100644
--- a/src/cli/list.c
+++ b/src/cli/list.c
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static void print_crash_list(vector_of_problem_data_t *crash_list, int detailed,
                 continue;
         }
 
-        printf("@%i\n", i);
         print_crash(crash, detailed, text_size);
         if (i != crash_list->len - 1)
             printf("\n");
-- 
1.8.1.4



More information about the Crash-catcher mailing list