<p dir="ltr">On Feb 22, 2013 1:50 AM, "Richard Fontana" <<a href="mailto:fontana@sharpeleven.org">fontana@sharpeleven.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p dir="ltr">> [...] I'll explain what this section is intended to<br>
> do (in the 0.2.0 version):<br>
><br>
> * If I (copyright holder) offer My Work (the work I inject with my<br>
> copyright interest) under copyleft-next, and later (after a 1-year<br>
> grace period has elapsed) offer the same work or [approximately] a<br>
> derivative work under a *proprietary* license (defined negatively as<br>
> something that doesn't meet the OSI OSD), then I additionally<br>
> license my copyright in My Work under the Apache License 2.0 (thus<br>
> giving everyone in the world an equal right to make proprietary<br>
> derived works).</p>
<p dir="ltr">It would make sense to have the sunset license and the poison pill license be the same.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Btw, is "permissive-next" Apache License 2.0 compatible, explicitly or implicitly? #lazyweb</p>