[copyleft-next] copyleft-next 0.2.0 released

Richard Fontana fontana at sharpeleven.org
Mon Feb 25 18:44:11 UTC 2013


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:46:30PM +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 21/02/13 15:15, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:59:16AM +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> >> Reversing the question, how can we make it clear that it's OK to ship
> >> Windows binaries of copyleft-next code?
> > 
> > That is a good way of stating the issue. In my experience, these days
> > that's a common specific circumstance in which thinking about the
> > system library exception (or some broader understanding of it) comes
> > up.
> 
> OK... so I don't know the answer to this without reinventing the system
> library exception. Does anyone else?

Not me, not yet. 

The only thing I know for sure is that we don't want to use the GPLv3
version of the system library exception. :)

- RF



More information about the copyleft-next mailing list