[copyleft-next] Network access to Corresponding Source

Ben Cotton bcotton at funnelfiasco.com
Sat Feb 9 18:52:53 UTC 2013


On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Stephen Michael Kellat
<skellat at fastmail.net> wrote:

> "Corresponding source shall be accessible via non-proprietary means of
> access without charge, need for identity verification, or user traffic
> logging."
>
That would seem to prohibit even basic logging of HTTP traffic, which
would be unacceptable to most sysadmins and possibly unenforceable in
some jurisdictions. I don't think that's what you intended, but the
wording is sufficiently vague. "Non-proprietary" would also require
greater clarity if it ever came to litigation.

-- 
Ben Cotton


More information about the copyleft-next mailing list