[copyleft-next] [MERGE REQUEST] HBR should require the project stands up for software freedom of those who contribute to it

Engel Nyst engel.nyst at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 21:37:00 UTC 2013


On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at ebb.org> wrote:
> I'll try to avoid using identi.ca to discuss
> copyleft-next in future.
>
> I do agree that having to follow GitHub, identi.ca, Gitorious, and this
> mailing list is annoying.  While HBR doesn't prohibit it, I suggest we
> all work to restrain ourselves to use *only* the mailing list and
> Gitorious and nothing else for now, to avoid people having to track so
> many fora.
>

I'd suggest a tweak to this, if I may: discussions happen, on other media,
and they may contain proposals or raise issues. Before they result in
any kind of changes in copyleft-next, they could/should be referenced
and discussed on this mailing list. Would that work, to address the too
many fora?

Regarding import of existing github issues content, I'll be happy to make
the import, when the project chooses its wanted tracker.
There are about thirty issues so far, maybe not critical, but for
traceability in the future it still makes sense, at least to me, to keep the
data.


More information about the copyleft-next mailing list