[copyleft-next] exceptions/additional-permissions & weak copyleft (was Re: Some initial comments on the copyleft-next draft)
Bradley M. Kuhn
bkuhn at ebb.org
Tue Jul 31 23:57:17 UTC 2012
Richard Fontana wrote at 21:49 (EDT) on Monday:
> I've become more skeptical of the value of additional permissions (or
> 'exceptions' as they were called in the pre-GPLv3 era) because of the
> complexity cost they add to a given licensing situation.
To argue against additional permissions is effectively to argue against
weak copyleft. Are you saying there should be no weak copyleft? (I'm
not trolling; I'm asking a philosophical question: particularly given
that you're the author of LGPLv3 as an exception set to GPLv3.)
> A suitable integral weak copyleft variety of AGPL presumably could
> have been applied to stet such that the clever notice wouldn't have
> been necessary. (I'm not sure if the notice even *was* necessary, but
> I don't remember much about how stet and RT fit together.)
But... but... there's no philosophical difference between a weak
copyleft and an additional-permission set. They are the same thing!
--
-- bkuhn
More information about the copyleft-next
mailing list