[PATCH] [man] improve wording and minor formatting issues
Miroslav Suchý
msuchy at redhat.com
Mon Mar 17 08:53:48 UTC 2014
On 03/17/2014 01:54 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> The use of COPR, copr, Copr is a bit inconsistent, I tried to use Copr when
> referring to the build system and copr for repos. And there's the question
> of whether it's supposed to be coprs, or copr repositories, or...?
*nod* The term Copr was overloaded. For last few months I'm trying to use Copr only for
project itself. And for copr (in meaning of repository/project) I'm using term "project".
E.g. "The copr repo to build the package in." I would rephrase now as "The project to build the package in."
I applied yours commit, because it is definitely better then current situation. But feel free to send another commit
with changes s/copr/project/ where it is appropriate.
> Only notable change was to change the API URL to the fedoraproject one. I
> found the previous mention confusing, I tried to use .../whot/project/api,
> and ...whot/api before I realised it's just the server name.
> Feel free to apply all hunks or just partially, as you prefer.
I tried to be general here, because you can create and deploy your own build system. But I agree that 99% of people will
use Fedora instance, so using full URL will be less confusing.
Thanks for the contribution.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
More information about the copr-devel
mailing list