Removal of Fedora 18

Kevin Fenzi kevin at
Thu Jan 9 15:28:09 UTC 2014

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:24:54 -0800
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at> wrote:

> > I'd prefer it just be disabled on fedora 18 eol day... people
> > shouldn't be producing new coprs against old eol releases.
> > 
> +1
> > I agree with keeping existing ones around for a while though,
> > perhaps those could live another month or three.
> > 
> I disagree with this one, though -- built packages should remain
> "forver". Packages for EOL fedora releases are still available and
> repositories on for EOL releases are not
> pruned.  Those are the precedents that we should be following.


> We may want to move them out of copr (similar to how EOL fedora
> releases get moved to
> Are packages under the user's quota?  If so,
> we may want to establish a quota for EOL packages as well so that the
> user is encouraged to self-prune EOL or no longer needed builds
> (package has been merged into newer fedora or etc).

They are under the users quota on fedorapeople. 

I personally remove my old ones right after EOL, but I'm sure some
people keep them around. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the copr-devel mailing list