Cucumber and you (or I, as it were)

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Wed Jul 21 12:13:41 UTC 2010


On 07/21/2010 07:55 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Bryan Kearney<bkearney at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> On 07/19/2010 11:56 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
>>>
>>> As before, my opinion is strongly that we are essentially re-inventing
>>> variables and namespaces because cuke has chopped out most everything
>>> we've ever known about organizing and re-using test code with classes,
>>> inheritance, fixtures, methods, and return values. I still can't
>>
>> Have you or anyone else  posted this to any cuke mailing list? Is this the
>> way it is with Cuke, or how we are using it?
>>
>> -- bk
>>
>
> Got a little feedback in that thread, I do not think it is the way we
> are using cukes. Surely we could clean some things up but it looks
> like the core complaints I have are just the way it is.
>
>
I am concerned a bit about schedule, and I like the idea of external 
functional tests. I would be open to changing this if the pain (read 
time) is not too huge.

-- bk




More information about the candlepin mailing list